🔴 ALLEGED CHILD GROOMER MUHAMMED SABIH: CHARGED
Muhammed Sabih charged after facilitating a meeting with a child after grooming her online. Muhammed Sabih, 28, from Pakistan, has been charged with sexual offences after grooming a 14 year old British schoolgirl online and arranging to meet her. He had in depth sexual conversations, encouraging sexual activity and providing information about his biting fetish in anticipation of a meeting. He told the girl to keep everything secret, telling her that UK laws were “not good”. Sabih came to the UK on a marriage Visa and left his wife months later.
Sabih was caught in a decoy operation organised by the group Elusive Child Protection Unit Manchester.
He had to be restrained and put on ground the by arresting officers.
He has now been charged with child grooming offences.
ACCESS TO THE LAW: Understanding the Crime and Sentencing
As part of our campaign to improve citizens’ access and understanding of UK Criminal law, we will be explaining the relevant UK legislation surrounding any case law relevant to our articles:
Grooming a child for sexual purposes is a serious criminal offence under UK Law. The Sexual Offences Act 2003 specifically addresses online grooming, making it illegal to communicate with a child with the intention of meeting for sexual activity.
Even if no physical contact occurs, the intent to exploit a child sexually is enough to secure a conviction. Sending explicit material to a child, as seen in this case, further compounds the severity of the offence, as it exposes minors to harmful and inappropriate content.
Convictions can lead to lengthy prison sentences, as well as inclusion on the sex offenders’ register, which significantly restricts future employment and travel. Understanding these legal protections is vital for safeguarding vulnerable individuals, especially as online grooming cases continue to rise.
Additionally In the UK, Ignorance of the law is not a valid defense. This principle is based on the idea that the law is publicly accessible, and citizens have a duty to be informed. The courts should operate under “Ignorantia juris non excusat”, meaning ignorance of the law excuses no one.
Simply put, claiming you didn’t know an action was illegal doesn’t absolve responsibility; you’re expected to make yourself aware of legal standards. This maintains fairness, ensuring all citizens are held to the same legal expectations, regardless of their knowledge or intent.
Well, that’s all for now. But until our next report, please stay tuned, stay informed, but most of all please stay safe, and we'll see you then.
