WAG WARS: Courtroom BOMBSHELL as Rebekah Vardy's Cost Claims Crumble in Shocking Appeal Defeat!
In a stunning twist to the already explosive saga dubbed “Wagatha Christie,” Rebekah Vardy has suffered a
The drama unfolded like a as Justice Cavanagh in a ruling that branded her cost complaints as "not unreasonable but just wrong" leaving the wife of Leicester City striker Jamie Vardy footing the lion's share of Coleen Rooney’s towering legal bill.
And yes you read that right, Vardy now stares down the barrel of covering after that’s captivated Britain since 2019.
It all began with .
Coleen Rooney, wife of football legend Wayne Rooney, accused Rebekah Vardy of leaking stories to the press from her private Instagram account. Her now-iconic reveal was dubbed “Wagatha Christie” a reference to the queen of detective novels. Vardy launched a libel case in response, a decision that would soon unravel .
After a jaw-dropping trial that aired every glittery grievance and screenshot, Vardy . But she wasn’t done, oh no. She returned to court in 2025, appealing a decision that ordered her to pay a of Rooney’s legal fees.
Her lawyers claimed Coleen's team misled the court over costs and called her own legal bill estimates "grotesque." But in a , the court was having .
“This whole thing is an embarrassment,” said one stunned observer outside the Royal Courts of Justice. “She tried to sue for defamation and now she’s being told to fork out most of the other side’s legal bill. You couldn’t make it up!”
Vardy’s lawyers argued that Coleen Rooney’s team had , making Vardy’s own figures look inflated by comparison. But the judge, backed by Acting Senior Costs Judge Jason Rowley, wasn’t convinced.
In a , Justice Cavanagh admitted the lack of transparency was “ not improper,” calling it a “mistake” — but .
If you thought reality TV delivered drama, this courtroom was serving . At one point, the judge quoted the infamous “grotesque” label that Vardy’s own legal team used to describe Rooney’s budget only to conclude .
- Vardy’s actual legal costs up to August 2021 were
- She tried to claim just £220,955.07 on the official form — a whopping 40% discount
- Rooney’s camp? Estimated in the same period
- The court ruled that even if Rooney’s team had been aggressive, they were still
Let that sink in: Vardy’s team argued against high costs while hiding how much they’d . The judge called their attack “not apples to apples” more like .
A furious legal insider told us, “This appeal should never have happened. It cost money, court time, and achieved nothing except confirming what we already knew — Vardy lost, and she lost hard.”
A veteran trial analyst added, “Rebekah’s attempt to paint Rooney’s lawyers as dishonest backfired spectacularly. The judge basically said, ‘Nice try, but you still pay.’”
Behind the headlines is a woman who’s now endured public ridicule, courtroom scrutiny, and financial fallout. One family friend told us off the record:
Meanwhile, sources close to Coleen Rooney said she felt “vindicated and relieved,” but “sad it had to come to this.”
The battle between these two WAGs may have started with Instagram, but it has ended with a and a permanent spot in British tabloid history.
With the appeal dead in the water, Vardy must now cough up a fortune to Rooney with no fresh chance of reducing that bill. Legal experts say she could still face , but they’re unlikely to improve her situation.
Coleen walks away not just with her reputation intact but with a courtroom triumph that will be studied in legal circles for years and gossiped about for decades.
"She tried to clear her name," one courtroom commentator said. "But what she cleared was her bank account."
